Menu
GWAS Study

Preliminary genome-wide association study of bipolar disorder in the Japanese population.

Hattori E, Toyota T, Ishitsuka Y et al.

19259986 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
1018 Participants
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

HE
Hattori E
TT
Toyota T
IY
Ishitsuka Y
IY
Iwayama Y
YK
Yamada K
UH
Ujike H
MY
Morita Y
KM
Kodama M
NK
Nakata K
MY
Minabe Y
NK
Nakamura K
IY
Iwata Y
TN
Takei N
MN
Mori N
NH
Naitoh H
YY
Yamanouchi Y
IN
Iwata N
ON
Ozaki N
KT
Kato T
NT
Nishikawa T
KA
Kashiwa A
SM
Suzuki M
SK
Shioe K
SM
Shinohara M
HM
Hirano M
NS
Nanko S
AA
Akahane A
UM
Ueno M
KN
Kaneko N
WY
Watanabe Y
ST
Someya T
HK
Hashimoto K
IM
Iyo M
IM
Itokawa M
AM
Arai M
NM
Nankai M
IT
Inada T
YS
Yoshida S
KH
Kunugi H
NM
Nakamura M
IY
Iijima Y
OY
Okazaki Y
HT
Higuchi T
YT
Yoshikawa T
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Recent progress in genotyping technology and the development of public databases has enabled large-scale genome-wide association tests with diseases. We performed a two-stage genome-wide association study (GWAS) of bipolar disorder (BD) in Japanese cohorts. First we used Affymetrix 100K GeneChip arrays in the analysis of 107 cases with bipolar I disorder and 107 controls, and selected markers that were nominally significant (P < 0.01) in at least one of the three models (1,577 markers in total). In the follow-up stage, we analyzed these markers using an Illumina platform (1,526 markers; 51 markers were not designable for the platform) and an independent sample set, which consisted of 395 cases (bipolar I + II) and 409 controls. We also assessed the population stratification of current samples using principal components analysis. After the two-stage analysis, 89 markers remained nominally significant (allelic P < 0.05) with the same allele being consistently over-represented in both the first and the follow-up stages. However, none of these were significant after correction for multiple-testing by false discovery rates. Sample stratification was virtually negligible. Collectively, this is the first GWAS of BD in the Japanese population. But given the small sample size and the limited genomic coverage, these results should be taken as preliminary.

107 Japanese ancestry cases, 107 Japanese ancestry controls

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

1018
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
Yes
Replicated
395 Japanese ancestry cases, 409 Japanese ancestry controls
Replication Participants
East Asian
Ancestry
Japan
Recruitment Country
Chapter IV

Analysis

Comprehensive review of health and genetic findings

Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.

Analysis In Progress

Our analysis of this publication is currently being prepared. Please check back soon for comprehensive insights into the health and genetic findings discussed in this research.