Menu
GWAS Study

Genetic variation in GIPR influences the glucose and insulin responses to an oral glucose challenge.

Saxena R, Hivert MF, Langenberg C et al.

20081857 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
45854 Participants
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

SR
Saxena R
HM
Hivert MF
LC
Langenberg C
TT
Tanaka T
PJ
Pankow JS
VP
Vollenweider P
LV
Lyssenko V
BN
Bouatia-Naji N
DJ
Dupuis J
JA
Jackson AU
KW
Kao WH
LM
Li M
GN
Glazer NL
MA
Manning AK
LJ
Luan J
SH
Stringham HM
PI
Prokopenko I
JT
Johnson T
GN
Grarup N
BT
Boesgaard TW
LC
Lecoeur C
SP
Shrader P
OJ
O'Connell J
IE
Ingelsson E
CD
Couper DJ
RK
Rice K
SK
Song K
AC
Andreasen CH
DC
Dina C
KA
Köttgen A
LB
Le Bacquer O
PF
Pattou F
TJ
Taneera J
SV
Steinthorsdottir V
RD
Rybin D
AK
Ardlie K
SM
Sampson M
QL
Qi L
VH
van Hoek M
WM
Weedon MN
AY
Aulchenko YS
VB
Voight BF
GH
Grallert H
BB
Balkau B
BR
Bergman RN
BS
Bielinski SJ
BA
Bonnefond A
BL
Bonnycastle LL
BK
Borch-Johnsen K
BY
Böttcher Y
BE
Brunner E
BT
Buchanan TA
BS
Bumpstead SJ
CC
Cavalcanti-Proença C
CG
Charpentier G
CY
Chen YD
CP
Chines PS
CF
Collins FS
CM
Cornelis M
JC
J Crawford G
DJ
Delplanque J
DA
Doney A
EJ
Egan JM
EM
Erdos MR
FM
Firmann M
FN
Forouhi NG
FC
Fox CS
GM
Goodarzi MO
GJ
Graessler J
HA
Hingorani A
IB
Isomaa B
JT
Jørgensen T
KM
Kivimaki M
KP
Kovacs P
KK
Krohn K
KM
Kumari M
LT
Lauritzen T
LC
Lévy-Marchal C
MV
Mayor V
MJ
McAteer JB
MD
Meyre D
MB
Mitchell BD
MK
Mohlke KL
MM
Morken MA
NN
Narisu N
PC
Palmer CN
PR
Pakyz R
PL
Pascoe L
PF
Payne F
PD
Pearson D
RW
Rathmann W
SA
Sandbaek A
SA
Sayer AA
SL
Scott LJ
SS
Sharp SJ
SE
Sijbrands E
SA
Singleton A
SD
Siscovick DS
SN
Smith NL
ST
Sparsø T
SA
Swift AJ
SH
Syddall H
TG
Thorleifsson G
TA
Tönjes A
TT
Tuomi T
TJ
Tuomilehto J
VT
Valle TT
WG
Waeber G
WA
Walley A
WD
Waterworth DM
ZE
Zeggini E
ZJ
Zhao JH
IT
Illig T
WH
Wichmann HE
WJ
Wilson JF
VD
van Duijn C
HF
Hu FB
MA
Morris AD
FT
Frayling TM
HA
Hattersley AT
TU
Thorsteinsdottir U
SK
Stefansson K
NP
Nilsson P
SA
Syvänen AC
SA
Shuldiner AR
WM
Walker M
BS
Bornstein SR
SP
Schwarz P
WG
Williams GH
ND
Nathan DM
KJ
Kuusisto J
LM
Laakso M
CC
Cooper C
MM
Marmot M
FL
Ferrucci L
MV
Mooser V
SM
Stumvoll M
LR
Loos RJ
AD
Altshuler D
PB
Psaty BM
RJ
Rotter JI
BE
Boerwinkle E
HT
Hansen T
PO
Pedersen O
FJ
Florez JC
MM
McCarthy MI
BM
Boehnke M
BI
Barroso I
SR
Sladek R
FP
Froguel P
MJ
Meigs JB
GL
Groop L
WN
Wareham NJ
WR
Watanabe RM
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Glucose levels 2 h after an oral glucose challenge are a clinical measure of glucose tolerance used in the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes. We report a meta-analysis of nine genome-wide association studies (n = 15,234 nondiabetic individuals) and a follow-up of 29 independent loci (n = 6,958-30,620). We identify variants at the GIPR locus associated with 2-h glucose level (rs10423928, beta (s.e.m.) = 0.09 (0.01) mmol/l per A allele, P = 2.0 x 10(-15)). The GIPR A-allele carriers also showed decreased insulin secretion (n = 22,492; insulinogenic index, P = 1.0 x 10(-17); ratio of insulin to glucose area under the curve, P = 1.3 x 10(-16)) and diminished incretin effect (n = 804; P = 4.3 x 10(-4)). We also identified variants at ADCY5 (rs2877716, P = 4.2 x 10(-16)), VPS13C (rs17271305, P = 4.1 x 10(-8)), GCKR (rs1260326, P = 7.1 x 10(-11)) and TCF7L2 (rs7903146, P = 4.2 x 10(-10)) associated with 2-h glucose. Of the three newly implicated loci (GIPR, ADCY5 and VPS13C), only ADCY5 was found to be associated with type 2 diabetes in collaborating studies (n = 35,869 cases, 89,798 controls, OR = 1.12, 95% CI 1.09-1.15, P = 4.8 x 10(-18)).

15,234 individuals

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

45854
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
Yes
Replicated
up to 30,620 European ancestry individuals
Replication Participants
European, European, Other
Ancestry
Finland, Sweden, U.S., Germany, U.K., France, Denmark, Switzerland
Recruitment Country
Chapter IV

Analysis

Comprehensive review of health and genetic findings

Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.

Analysis In Progress

Our analysis of this publication is currently being prepared. Please check back soon for comprehensive insights into the health and genetic findings discussed in this research.