Menu
GWAS Study

Pharmacogenetic analysis of belimumab fails to identify robust genetic predictors of efficacy in lupus.

St Jean PL, Roth DA, McCarthy LC et al.

31058715 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
1020 Participants
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

SJ
St Jean PL
RD
Roth DA
ML
McCarthy LC
HA
Hughes AR
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) conducted pharmacogenetic (PGx) analyses to determine whether genetic variants influence response to belimumab treatment in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We conducted an exploratory genome-wide meta-analysis (GWAS) of 10.9 million genetic variants and the efficacy data from 816 belimumab-treated SLE patients in three phase 3 belimumab clinical studies. Two highly correlated variants, rs293983 and rs364370, in the ANO3 (anoctamin 3) gene region were significantly associated with efficacy as measured by the SLE Response Index (SRI4) with a per-T-allele odds ratio (OR) of 2.15 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.66-2.79, P=8.0×10]. In contrast, there was no association with SRI4 response in 577 placebo-treated patients (per-T-allele OR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.74-1.29, P=0.87). A post-hoc analysis by geographic region revealed a strong SRI4 response signal in 157 belimumab-treated patients from Asia (per-T-allele OR=2.85, 95% CI: 1.41-5.74, P=0.0021). On the basis of this encouraging finding in Asian patients, we conducted a confirmatory analysis of the SRI4 end point in an independent phase 3 study of SLE patients from northeast Asia. We found no evidence of an association between rs293983 and SRI4 response in 204 belimumab-treated patients (per-T-allele OR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.52-1.57, P=0.64). The inability to replicate the observed GWAS effect suggests this was a false positive result; hence, we failed to identify any genetic variants significantly associated with belimumab efficacy.

443 European, Asian, American Indian or Alaskan Native, African American or unknown ancestry responders, 373 European, Asian, American Indian or Alaskan Native, African American or unknown ancestry non-responders

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

1020
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
Yes
Replicated
101 Northeast Asian ancestry responders, 103 Northeast Asian ancestry non-responders
Replication Participants
European, African American or Afro-Caribbean, Native American, NR, East Asian, Asian unspecified
Ancestry
China, Japan, Republic of Korea
Recruitment Country
Chapter IV

Analysis

Comprehensive review of health and genetic findings

Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.

Analysis In Progress

Our analysis of this publication is currently being prepared. Please check back soon for comprehensive insights into the health and genetic findings discussed in this research.