Menu
GWAS Study

Germline variants and somatic mutation signatures of breast cancer across populations of African and European ancestry in the US and Nigeria.

Wang S, Pitt JJ, Zheng Y et al.

31173346 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
1144 Participants
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

WS
Wang S
PJ
Pitt JJ
ZY
Zheng Y
YT
Yoshimatsu TF
GG
Gao G
SA
Sanni A
OO
Oluwasola O
AM
Ajani M
FD
Fitzgerald D
OA
Odetunde A
KG
Khramtsova G
HI
Hurley I
PA
Popoola A
FA
Falusi A
OT
Ogundiran T
OJ
Obafunwa J
OO
Ojengbede O
IN
Ibrahim N
BJ
Barretina J
WK
White KP
HD
Huo D
OO
Olopade OI
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Somatic mutation signatures may represent footprints of genetic and environmental exposures that cause different cancer. Few studies have comprehensively examined their association with germline variants, and none in an indigenous African population. SomaticSignatures was employed to extract mutation signatures based on whole-genome or whole-exome sequencing data from female patients with breast cancer (TCGA, training set, n = 1,011; Nigerian samples, validation set, n = 170), and to estimate contributions of signatures in each sample. Association between somatic signatures and common single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) or rare deleterious variants were examined using linear regression. Nine stable signatures were inferred, and four signatures (APOBEC C>T, APOBEC C>G, aging and homologous recombination deficiency) were highly similar to known COSMIC signatures and explained the majority (60-85%) of signature contributions. There were significant heritable components associated with APOBEC C>T signature (h2 = 0.575, p = 0.010) and the combined APOBEC signatures (h2 = 0.432, p = 0.042). In TCGA dataset, seven common SNPs within or near GNB5 were significantly associated with an increased proportion (beta = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.21-0.45) of APOBEC signature contribution at genome-wide significance, while rare germline mutations in MTCL1 was also significantly associated with a higher contribution of this signature (p = 6.1 × 10-6 ). This is the first study to identify associations between germline variants and mutational patterns in breast cancer across diverse populations and geography. The findings provide evidence to substantiate causal links between germline genetic risk variants and carcinogenesis.

974 European, African American and Asian ancestry individuals

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

1144
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
Yes
Replicated
170 Nigerian ancestry individuals
Replication Participants
African American or Afro-Caribbean, Asian unspecified, European, Sub-Saharan African
Ancestry
U.S., Nigeria
Recruitment Country
Chapter IV

Analysis

Comprehensive review of health and genetic findings

Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.

Analysis In Progress

Our analysis of this publication is currently being prepared. Please check back soon for comprehensive insights into the health and genetic findings discussed in this research.