Menu
GWAS Study

Identification of risk loci and a polygenic risk score for lung cancer: a large-scale prospective cohort study in Chinese populations.

Dai J, Lv J, Zhu M et al.

31326317 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
35705 Participants
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

DJ
Dai J
LJ
Lv J
ZM
Zhu M
WY
Wang Y
QN
Qin N
MH
Ma H
HY
He YQ
ZR
Zhang R
TW
Tan W
FJ
Fan J
WT
Wang T
ZH
Zheng H
SQ
Sun Q
WL
Wang L
HM
Huang M
GZ
Ge Z
YC
Yu C
GY
Guo Y
WT
Wang TM
WJ
Wang J
XL
Xu L
WW
Wu W
CL
Chen L
BZ
Bian Z
WR
Walters R
MI
Millwood IY
LX
Li XZ
WX
Wang X
HR
Hung RJ
CD
Christiani DC
CH
Chen H
WM
Wang M
WC
Wang C
JY
Jiang Y
CK
Chen K
CZ
Chen Z
JG
Jin G
WT
Wu T
LD
Lin D
HZ
Hu Z
AC
Amos CI
WC
Wu C
WQ
Wei Q
JW
Jia WH
LL
Li L
SH
Shen H
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Genetic variation has an important role in the development of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, genetic factors for lung cancer have not been fully identified, especially in Chinese populations, which limits the use of existing polygenic risk scores (PRS) to identify subpopulations at high risk of lung cancer for prevention. We therefore aimed to identify novel loci associated with NSCLC risk, and generate a PRS and evaluate its utility and effectiveness in the prediction of lung cancer risk in Chinese populations.

3,860 Chinese ancestry cases, 4,490 European ancestry cases, 13,328 Chinese ancestry controls, 14,027 European ancestry controls

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

35705
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
No
Replicated
European, East Asian
Ancestry
China
Recruitment Country
Chapter IV

Analysis

Comprehensive review of health and genetic findings

Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.

Analysis In Progress

Our analysis of this publication is currently being prepared. Please check back soon for comprehensive insights into the health and genetic findings discussed in this research.