Menu
GWAS Study

Secondary Genome-Wide Association Study Using Novel Analytical Strategies Disentangle Genetic Components of Cleft Lip and/or Cleft Palate in 1q32.2.

Yang Y, Suzuki A, Iwata J et al.

33137956 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
10542 Participants
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

YY
Yang Y
SA
Suzuki A
IJ
Iwata J
JG
Jun G
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Orofacial cleft (OFC) is one of the most prevalent birth defects, leading to substantial and long-term burdens in a newborn's quality of life. Although studies revealed several genetic variants associated with the birth defect, novel approaches may provide additional clues about its etiology. Using the Center for Craniofacial and Dental Genetics project data (n = 10,542), we performed linear mixed-model analyses to study the genetic compositions of OFC and investigated the dependence among identified loci using conditional analyses. To identify genes associated with OFC, we conducted a transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS) based on predicted expression levels. In addition to confirming the previous findings at four loci, 1q32.2, 8q24, 2p24.2 and 17p13.1, we untwined two independent loci at 1q32.2, TRAF3IP3 and IRF6. The sentinel SNP in TRAF3IP3 (rs2235370, p-value = 5.15 × 10-9) was independent of the sentinel SNP at IRF6 (rs2235373, r2 < 0.3). We found that the IRF6 effect became nonsignificant once the 8q24 effect was conditioned, while the TRAF3IP3 effect remained significant. Furthermore, we identified nine genes associated with OFC in TWAS, implicating a glutathione synthesis and drug detoxification pathway. We identified some meaningful additions to the OFC etiology using novel statistical methods in the existing data.

160 African ancestry cases, 584 Asian ancestry cases, 1,068 European ancestry cases, 37 Native American ancestry cases, 849 admixed ancestry cases, 5 cases, 219 African ancestry controls, 1,433 Asian ancestry controls, 3,563 European ancestry controls, 152 Native American ancestry controls, 2,420 admixed ancestry controls, 52 controls

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

10542
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
No
Replicated
European, African unspecified, Native American, Asian unspecified, Other admixed ancestry
Ancestry
Chapter IV

Analysis

Comprehensive review of health and genetic findings

Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.

Analysis In Progress

Our analysis of this publication is currently being prepared. Please check back soon for comprehensive insights into the health and genetic findings discussed in this research.