Menu
GWAS Study

The PAX1 locus at 20p11 is a potential genetic modifier for bilateral cleft lip.

Curtis SW, Chang D, Lee MK et al.

33817668 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
1670 Participants
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

CS
Curtis SW
CD
Chang D
LM
Lee MK
SJ
Shaffer JR
IK
Indencleef K
EM
Epstein MP
CD
Cutler DJ
MJ
Murray JC
FE
Feingold E
BT
Beaty TH
CP
Claes P
WS
Weinberg SM
MM
Marazita ML
CJ
Carlson JC
LE
Leslie EJ
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Nonsyndromic orofacial clefts (OFCs) are a common birth defect and are phenotypically heterogenous in the structure affected by the cleft - cleft lip (CL) and cleft lip and palate (CLP) - as well as other features, such as the severity of the cleft. Here, we focus on bilateral and unilateral clefts as one dimension of OFC severity, because the genetic architecture of these subtypes is not well understood. We tested for subtype-specific genetic associations in 44 bilateral CL (BCL) cases, 434 unilateral CL (UCL) cases, 530 bilateral CLP cases (BCLP), 1123 unilateral CLP (UCLP) cases, and unrelated controls (N = 1626), using a mixed-model approach. While no novel loci were found, the genetic architecture of UCL was distinct compared to BCL, with 44.03% of suggestive loci having different effects between the two subtypes. To further understand the subtype-specific genetic risk factors, we performed a genome-wide scan for modifiers and found a significant modifier locus on 20p11 (p=7.53×10-9), 300kb downstream of PAX1, that associated with higher odds of BCL vs. UCL, and replicated in an independent cohort (p=0.0018) with no effect in BCLP (p>0.05). We further found that this locus was associated with normal human nasal shape. Taken together, these results suggest bilateral and unilateral clefts may have different genetic architectures. Moreover, our results suggest BCL, the rarest form of OFC, may be genetically distinct from the other OFC subtypes. This expands our understanding of modifiers for OFC subtypes and further elucidates the genetic mechanisms behind the phenotypic heterogeneity in OFCs.

15 Asian ancestry cases, 13 European ancestry cases, 15 Hispanic cases, 1 case, 161 Asian ancestry controls, 835 European ancestry controls, 626 Hispanic controls, 4 controls

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

1670
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
Yes
Replicated
28 bilateral cases, 329 unilateral cases
Replication Participants
Asian unspecified, European, Hispanic or Latin American
Ancestry
China, Philippines, Turkey, Denmark, Spain, Argentina, Colombia, Guatemala, Puerto Rico, U.S.
Recruitment Country
Chapter IV

Analysis

Comprehensive review of health and genetic findings

Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.

Analysis In Progress

Our analysis of this publication is currently being prepared. Please check back soon for comprehensive insights into the health and genetic findings discussed in this research.