Menu
GWAS Study

Identification of Recessively Inherited Genetic Variants Potentially Linked to Pancreatic Cancer Risk.

Lu Y, Gentiluomo M, Macauda A et al.

34926279 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
22826 Participants
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

LY
Lu Y
GM
Gentiluomo M
MA
Macauda A
GD
Gioffreda D
GM
Gazouli M
PM
Petrone MC
KD
Kelemen D
GL
Ginocchi L
ML
Morelli L
PK
Papiris K
GW
Greenhalf W
IJ
Izbicki JR
KV
Kiudelis V
MB
Mohelníková-Duchoňová B
BB
Bueno-de-Mesquita B
VP
Vodicka P
BH
Brenner H
DM
Diener MK
PR
Pezzilli R
IA
Ivanauskas A
SR
Salvia R
SA
Szentesi A
AM
Aoki MN
NB
Németh BC
SC
Sperti C
JK
Jamroziak K
CR
Chammas R
OM
Oliverius M
AL
Archibugi L
ES
Ermini S
NJ
Novák J
KJ
Kupcinskas J
SO
Strouhal O
SP
Souček P
CG
Cavestro GM
MA
Milanetto AC
VG
Vanella G
NJ
Neoptolemos JP
TG
Theodoropoulos GE
VL
van Laarhoven HWM
MA
Mambrini A
MS
Moz S
KZ
Kala Z
LM
Loveček M
BD
Basso D
UF
Uzunoglu FG
HT
Hackert T
TS
Testoni SGG
HV
Hlaváč V
AA
Andriulli A
LM
Lucchesi M
TF
Tavano F
CS
Carrara S
HP
Hegyi P
AP
Arcidiacono PG
BO
Busch OR
LR
Lawlor RT
PM
Puzzono M
BU
Boggi U
GF
Guo F
ME
Małecka-Panas E
CG
Capurso G
LS
Landi S
TR
Talar-Wojnarowska R
SO
Strobel O
GX
Gao X
VY
Vashist Y
CD
Campa D
CF
Canzian F
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Although 21 pancreatic cancer susceptibility loci have been identified in individuals of European ancestry through genome-wide association studies (GWASs), much of the heritability of pancreatic cancer risk remains unidentified. A recessive genetic model could be a powerful tool for identifying additional risk variants. To discover recessively inherited pancreatic cancer risk loci, we performed a re-analysis of the largest pancreatic cancer GWAS, the Pancreatic Cancer Cohort Consortium (PanScan) and the Pancreatic Cancer Case-Control Consortium (PanC4), including 8,769 cases and 7,055 controls of European ancestry. Six single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) showed associations with pancreatic cancer risk according to a recessive model of inheritance. We replicated these variants in 3,212 cases and 3,470 controls collected from the PANcreatic Disease ReseArch (PANDoRA) consortium. The results of the meta-analyses confirmed that rs4626538 (7q32.2), rs7008921 (8p23.2) and rs147904962 (17q21.31) showed specific recessive effects (p<10-5) compared with the additive effects (p>10-3), although none of the six SNPs reached the conventional threshold for genome-wide significance (p < 5×10-8). Additional bioinformatic analysis explored the functional annotations of the SNPs and indicated a possible relationship between rs36018702 and expression of the BCL2L11 and BUB1 genes, which are known to be involved in pancreatic biology. Our findings, while not conclusive, indicate the importance of considering non-additive genetic models when performing GWAS analysis. The SNPs associated with pancreatic cancer in this study could be used for further meta-analysis for recessive association of SNPs and pancreatic cancer risk and might be a useful addiction to improve the performance of polygenic risk scores.

8,769 European ancestry cases, 7,055 European ancestry controls

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

22826
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
Yes
Replicated
70 Brazilian ancestry cases, 250 Brazilian ancestry controls, 3,212 European or unknown ancestry cases, 3,470 European or unknown ancestry controls
Replication Participants
Hispanic or Latin American, European, NR, European
Ancestry
Brazil, Greece, Czech Republic, Netherlands, Hungary, Poland, Italy, U.K., Lithuania, Germany
Recruitment Country
Chapter IV

Analysis

Comprehensive review of health and genetic findings

Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.

Analysis In Progress

Our analysis of this publication is currently being prepared. Please check back soon for comprehensive insights into the health and genetic findings discussed in this research.