Menu
GWAS Study

Biology of Perseverative Negative Thinking: The Role of Timing and Folate Intake.

Eszlari N, Bruncsics B, Millinghoffer A et al.

34959947 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
61983 Participants
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

EN
Eszlari N
BB
Bruncsics B
MA
Millinghoffer A
HG
Hullam G
PP
Petschner P
GX
Gonda X
BG
Breen G
AP
Antal P
BG
Bagdy G
DJ
Deakin JFW
JG
Juhasz G
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Past-oriented rumination and future-oriented worry are two aspects of perseverative negative thinking related to the neuroticism endophenotype and associated with depression and anxiety. Our present aim was to investigate the genomic background of these two aspects of perseverative negative thinking within separate groups of individuals with suboptimal versus optimal folate intake. We conducted a genome-wide association study in the UK Biobank database (n = 72,621) on the "rumination" and "worry" items of the Eysenck Personality Inventory Neuroticism scale in these separate groups. Optimal folate intake was related to lower worry, but unrelated to rumination. In contrast, genetic associations for worry did not implicate specific biological processes, while past-oriented rumination had a more specific genetic background, emphasizing its endophenotypic nature. Furthermore, biological pathways leading to rumination appeared to differ according to folate intake: purinergic signaling and circadian regulator gene ARNTL emerged in the whole sample, blastocyst development, DNA replication, and C-C chemokines in the suboptimal folate group, and prostaglandin response and K+ channel subunit gene KCNH3 in the optimal folate group. Our results point to possible benefits of folate in anxiety disorders, and to the importance of simultaneously taking into account genetic and environmental factors to determine personalized intervention in polygenic and multifactorial disorders.

30,213 British ancestry cases, 31,770 British ancestry controls

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

61983
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
No
Replicated
European
Ancestry
U.K.
Recruitment Country
Chapter IV

Analysis

Comprehensive review of health and genetic findings

Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.

Analysis In Progress

Our analysis of this publication is currently being prepared. Please check back soon for comprehensive insights into the health and genetic findings discussed in this research.