Menu
GWAS Study

Genome-wide association study of multiethnic nonsyndromic orofacial cleft families identifies novel loci specific to family and phenotypic subtypes.

Mukhopadhyay N, Feingold E, Moreno-Uribe L et al.

35191549 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
4891 Participants
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

MN
Mukhopadhyay N
FE
Feingold E
ML
Moreno-Uribe L
WG
Wehby G
VL
Valencia-Ramirez LC
RM
Restrepo Muñeton CP
PC
Padilla C
DF
Deleyiannis F
CK
Christensen K
PF
Poletta FA
OI
Orioli IM
HJ
Hecht JT
BC
Buxó CJ
BA
Butali A
AW
Adeyemo WL
VA
Vieira AR
SJ
Shaffer JR
MJ
Murray JC
WS
Weinberg SM
LE
Leslie EJ
MM
Marazita ML
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Nonsyndromic orofacial clefts (OFCs) are among the most common craniofacial birth defects worldwide, and known to exhibit phenotypic and genetic heterogeneity. Cleft lip plus cleft palate (CLP) and cleft lip only (CL) are commonly combined together as one phenotype (CL/P), separately from cleft palate alone. In comparison, our study analyzes CL and CLP separately. A sample of 2218 CL and CLP cases, 4537 unaffected relatives of cases, and 2673 pure controls with no family history of OFC were selected from the Pittsburgh Orofacial Cleft (Pitt-OFC) multiethnic study.genome-wide association studies were run for seven specific phenotypes created based on the cleft type(s) observed within these families, as well as the combined CL/P phenotype. Five novel genome-wide significant associations, 3q29 (rs62284390), 5p13.2 (rs609659), 7q22.1 (rs6465810), 19p13.3 (rs628271), and 20q13.33 (rs2427238), and nine associations (p ≤ 1.0E-05) within previously confirmed OFC loci-PAX7, IRF6, FAM49A, DCAF4L2, 8q24.21, ARID3B, NTN1, TANC2 and the WNT9B:WNT3 gene cluster-were observed. We also found that single nucleotide polymorphisms within a subset of the associated loci, both previously known and novel, differ substantially in terms of their effects across cleft- or family-specific phenotypes, indicating not only etiologic differences between CL and CLP, but also genetic heterogeneity within each of the two OFC subtypes.

1,050 Central and South American ancestry ancestry cases, 1,098 Central and South American ancestry ancestry controls, 569 European ancestry cases, 1,330 European ancestry controls, 445 Asian ancestry cases, 165 Asian ancestry controls, 154 African ancestry cases, 80 African ancestry controls

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

4891
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
No
Replicated
Hispanic or Latin American, European, Asian unspecified, African unspecified
Ancestry
Colombia, Argentina, Puerto Rico, U.S., Guatemala, Turkey, Hungary, Denmark, Spain, China, Philippines, India, Nigeria, Ethiopia
Recruitment Country
Chapter IV

Analysis

Comprehensive review of health and genetic findings

Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.

Analysis In Progress

Our analysis of this publication is currently being prepared. Please check back soon for comprehensive insights into the health and genetic findings discussed in this research.