Menu
GWAS Study

Discovery of 42 genome-wide significant loci associated with dyslexia.

Doust C, Fontanillas P, Eising E et al.

36266505 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
1138870 Participants
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

DC
Doust C
FP
Fontanillas P
EE
Eising E
GS
Gordon SD
WZ
Wang Z
AG
Alagöz G
MB
Molz B
PB
Pourcain BS
FC
Francks C
MR
Marioni RE
ZJ
Zhao J
PS
Paracchini S
TJ
Talcott JB
MA
Monaco AP
SJ
Stein JF
GJ
Gruen JR
OR
Olson RK
WE
Willcutt EG
DJ
DeFries JC
PB
Pennington BF
SS
Smith SD
WM
Wright MJ
MN
Martin NG
AA
Auton A
BT
Bates TC
FS
Fisher SE
LM
Luciano M
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Reading and writing are crucial life skills but roughly one in ten children are affected by dyslexia, which can persist into adulthood. Family studies of dyslexia suggest heritability up to 70%, yet few convincing genetic markers have been found. Here we performed a genome-wide association study of 51,800 adults self-reporting a dyslexia diagnosis and 1,087,070 controls and identified 42 independent genome-wide significant loci: 15 in genes linked to cognitive ability/educational attainment, and 27 new and potentially more specific to dyslexia. We validated 23 loci (13 new) in independent cohorts of Chinese and European ancestry. Genetic etiology of dyslexia was similar between sexes, and genetic covariance with many traits was found, including ambidexterity, but not neuroanatomical measures of language-related circuitry. Dyslexia polygenic scores explained up to 6% of variance in reading traits, and might in future contribute to earlier identification and remediation of dyslexia.

51,800 European ancestry cases, 1,087,070 European ancestry controls

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

1138870
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
No
Replicated
European
Ancestry
Chapter IV

Analysis

Comprehensive review of health and genetic findings

Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.

Analysis In Progress

Our analysis of this publication is currently being prepared. Please check back soon for comprehensive insights into the health and genetic findings discussed in this research.