Menu
GWAS Study

Not all roads lead to the immune system: the genetic basis of multiple sclerosis severity.

Jokubaitis VG, Campagna MP, Ibrahim O et al.

36448302 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
1813 Participants
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

JV
Jokubaitis VG
CM
Campagna MP
IO
Ibrahim O
SJ
Stankovich J
KP
Kleinova P
MF
Matesanz F
HD
Hui D
ES
Eichau S
SM
Slee M
LJ
Lechner-Scott J
LR
Lea R
KT
Kilpatrick TJ
KT
Kalincik T
DJ
De Jager PL
BA
Beecham A
MJ
McCauley JL
TB
Taylor BV
VS
Vucic S
LL
Laverick L
VK
Vodehnalova K
GM
García-Sanchéz MI
AA
Alcina A
VD
van der Walt A
HE
Havrdova EK
IG
Izquierdo G
PN
Patsopoulos N
HD
Horakova D
BH
Butzkueven H
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Multiple sclerosis is a leading cause of neurological disability in adults. Heterogeneity in multiple sclerosis clinical presentation has posed a major challenge for identifying genetic variants associated with disease outcomes. To overcome this challenge, we used prospectively ascertained clinical outcomes data from the largest international multiple sclerosis registry, MSBase. We assembled a cohort of deeply phenotyped individuals of European ancestry with relapse-onset multiple sclerosis. We used unbiased genome-wide association study and machine learning approaches to assess the genetic contribution to longitudinally defined multiple sclerosis severity phenotypes in 1813 individuals. Our primary analyses did not identify any genetic variants of moderate to large effect sizes that met genome-wide significance thresholds. The strongest signal was associated with rs7289446 (β = -0.4882, P = 2.73 × 10-7), intronic to SEZ6L on chromosome 22. However, we demonstrate that clinical outcomes in relapse-onset multiple sclerosis are associated with multiple genetic loci of small effect sizes. Using a machine learning approach incorporating over 62 000 variants together with clinical and demographic variables available at multiple sclerosis disease onset, we could predict severity with an area under the receiver operator curve of 0.84 (95% CI 0.79-0.88). Our machine learning algorithm achieved positive predictive value for outcome assignation of 80% and negative predictive value of 88%. This outperformed our machine learning algorithm that contained clinical and demographic variables alone (area under the receiver operator curve 0.54, 95% CI 0.48-0.60). Secondary, sex-stratified analyses identified two genetic loci that met genome-wide significance thresholds. One in females (rs10967273; βfemale = 0.8289, P = 3.52 × 10-8), the other in males (rs698805; βmale = -1.5395, P = 4.35 × 10-8), providing some evidence for sex dimorphism in multiple sclerosis severity. Tissue enrichment and pathway analyses identified an overrepresentation of genes expressed in CNS compartments generally, and specifically in the cerebellum (P = 0.023). These involved mitochondrial function, synaptic plasticity, oligodendroglial biology, cellular senescence, calcium and G-protein receptor signalling pathways. We further identified six variants with strong evidence for regulating clinical outcomes, the strongest signal again intronic to SEZ6L (adjusted hazard ratio 0.72, P = 4.85 × 10-4). Here we report a milestone in our progress towards understanding the clinical heterogeneity of multiple sclerosis outcomes, implicating functionally distinct mechanisms to multiple sclerosis risk. Importantly, we demonstrate that machine learning using common single nucleotide variant clusters, together with clinical variables readily available at diagnosis can improve prognostic capabilities at diagnosis, and with further validation has the potential to translate to meaningful clinical practice change.

1,813 European ancestry individuals

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

1813
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
No
Replicated
European
Ancestry
Czech Republic, Australia, Spain
Recruitment Country
Chapter IV

Analysis

Comprehensive review of health and genetic findings

Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.

Analysis In Progress

Our analysis of this publication is currently being prepared. Please check back soon for comprehensive insights into the health and genetic findings discussed in this research.