Menu
GWAS Study

Genetically adjusted PSA levels for prostate cancer screening.

Kachuri L, Hoffmann TJ, Jiang Y et al.

37264206 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
95768 Participants
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

KL
Kachuri L
HT
Hoffmann TJ
JY
Jiang Y
BS
Berndt SI
SJ
Shelley JP
SK
Schaffer KR
MM
Machiela MJ
FN
Freedman ND
HW
Huang WY
LS
Li SA
ER
Easterlin R
GP
Goodman PJ
TC
Till C
TI
Thompson I
LH
Lilja H
VD
Van Den Eeden SK
CS
Chanock SJ
HC
Haiman CA
CD
Conti DV
KR
Klein RJ
MJ
Mosley JD
GR
Graff RE
WJ
Witte JS
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening for prostate cancer remains controversial because it increases overdiagnosis and overtreatment of clinically insignificant tumors. Accounting for genetic determinants of constitutive, non-cancer-related PSA variation has potential to improve screening utility. In this study, we discovered 128 genome-wide significant associations (P < 5 × 10-8) in a multi-ancestry meta-analysis of 95,768 men and developed a PSA polygenic score (PGSPSA) that explains 9.61% of constitutive PSA variation. We found that, in men of European ancestry, using PGS-adjusted PSA would avoid up to 31% of negative prostate biopsies but also result in 12% fewer biopsies in patients with prostate cancer, mostly with Gleason score <7 tumors. Genetically adjusted PSA was more predictive of aggressive prostate cancer (odds ratio (OR) = 3.44, P = 6.2 × 10-14, area under the curve (AUC) = 0.755) than unadjusted PSA (OR = 3.31, P = 1.1 × 10-12, AUC = 0.738) in 106 cases and 23,667 controls. Compared to a prostate cancer PGS alone (AUC = 0.712), including genetically adjusted PSA improved detection of aggressive disease (AUC = 0.786, P = 7.2 × 10-4). Our findings highlight the potential utility of incorporating PGS for personalized biomarkers in prostate cancer screening.

85,824 European ancestry individuals, 3,509 African American or Afro-Caribbean individuals, 3,337 East Asian ancestry individuals, 3,098 Hispanic or Latin American individuals

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

95768
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
No
Replicated
European, African American or Afro-Caribbean, East Asian, Hispanic or Latin American
Ancestry
U.S., U.K.
Recruitment Country
Chapter IV

Analysis

Comprehensive review of health and genetic findings

Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.

Analysis In Progress

Our analysis of this publication is currently being prepared. Please check back soon for comprehensive insights into the health and genetic findings discussed in this research.