Menu
GWAS Study

APOE-ε4 and BIN1 increase risk of Alzheimer's disease pathology but not specifically of Lewy body pathology.

Talyansky S, Le Guen Y, Kasireddy N et al.

37700353 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
2335 Participants
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

TS
Talyansky S
LG
Le Guen Y
KN
Kasireddy N
BM
Belloy ME
GM
Greicius MD
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Lewy body (LB) pathology commonly occurs in individuals with Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology. However, it remains unclear which genetic risk factors underlie AD pathology, LB pathology, or AD-LB co-pathology. Notably, whether APOE-ε4 affects risk of LB pathology independently from AD pathology is controversial. We adapted criteria from the literature to classify 4,985 subjects from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) and the Rush University Medical Center as AD-LB co-pathology (AD+LB+), sole AD pathology (AD+LB-), sole LB pathology (AD-LB+), or no pathology (AD-LB-). We performed a meta-analysis of a genome-wide association study (GWAS) per subpopulation (NACC/Rush) for each disease phenotype compared to the control group (AD-LB-), and compared the AD+LB+ to AD+LB- groups. APOE-ε4 was significantly associated with risk of AD+LB- and AD+LB+ compared to AD-LB-. However, APOE-ε4 was not associated with risk of AD-LB+ compared to AD-LB- or risk of AD+LB+ compared to AD+LB-. Associations at the BIN1 locus exhibited qualitatively similar results. These results suggest that APOE-ε4 is a risk factor for AD pathology, but not for LB pathology when decoupled from AD pathology. The same holds for BIN1 risk variants. These findings, in the largest AD-LB neuropathology GWAS to date, distinguish the genetic risk factors for sole and dual AD-LB pathology phenotypes. Our GWAS meta-analysis summary statistics, derived from phenotypes based on postmortem pathologic evaluation, may provide more accurate disease-specific polygenic risk scores compared to GWAS based on clinical diagnoses, which are likely confounded by undetected dual pathology and clinical misdiagnoses of dementia type.

1,072 European ancestry postmortem cases, 1,263 European ancestry postmortem controls

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

2335
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
No
Replicated
European
Ancestry
U.S.
Recruitment Country
Chapter IV

Analysis

Comprehensive review of health and genetic findings

Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.

Analysis In Progress

Our analysis of this publication is currently being prepared. Please check back soon for comprehensive insights into the health and genetic findings discussed in this research.