Menu
GWAS Study

Novel genome-wide associations for effort valuation and psychopathology in children and adults.

Nguyen NH, Mazza TM, Hess JL et al.

37953388 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
1270 Participants
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

NN
Nguyen NH
MT
Mazza TM
HJ
Hess JL
AA
Albert AB
ES
Elfstrom S
FP
Forken P
BS
Blatt SD
FW
Fremont WP
FS
Faraone SV
GS
Glatt SJ
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

The Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) initiative was established by the US National Institute of Mental Health as a multilevel, disorder-agnostic framework for analysis of human psychopathology through designated domains and constructs, including the "Positive Valence Systems" domain focused on reward-related behavior. This study investigates the reward valuation subconstruct of "effort" and its association with genetic markers, functional neurobiological pathways, and polygenic risk scores for psychopathology in 1215 children aged 6-12 and their parents (n = 1044). All participants completed the effort expenditure for rewards task (EEfRT), which assesses "effort" according to two quantitative measures: hard-task choice and reward sensitivity. Genetic association analyses were undertaken in MAGMA, utilizing EEfRT outcome variables as genome-wide association studies phenotypes to compute SNP and gene-level associations. Genome-wide association analyses found two distinct genetic loci that were significantly associated with measures of reward sensitivity and a separate genetic locus associated with hard task choice. Gene-set enrichment analysis yielded significant associations between "effort" and multiple gene sets involved in reward processing-related pathways, including dopamine receptor signaling, limbic system and forebrain development, and biological response to cocaine. These results serve to establish "effort" as a relevant construct for understanding reward-related behavior at the genetic level and support the RDoC framework for assessing disorder-agnostic psychopathology.

1,270 European ancestry, African American or Afro-Caribbean, Hispanic or Latin American, NR ancestry individuals

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

1270
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
No
Replicated
European, African American or Afro-Caribbean, Hispanic or Latin American, NR
Ancestry
U.S.
Recruitment Country
Chapter IV

Analysis

Comprehensive review of health and genetic findings

Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.

Analysis In Progress

Our analysis of this publication is currently being prepared. Please check back soon for comprehensive insights into the health and genetic findings discussed in this research.