Menu
GWAS Study

Digital quantification of human eye color highlights genetic association of three new loci.

Liu F, Wollstein A, Hysi PG et al.

20463881 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
9494 Participants
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

LF
Liu F
WA
Wollstein A
HP
Hysi PG
AG
Ankra-Badu GA
ST
Spector TD
PD
Park D
ZG
Zhu G
LM
Larsson M
DD
Duffy DL
MG
Montgomery GW
MD
Mackey DA
WS
Walsh S
LO
Lao O
HA
Hofman A
RF
Rivadeneira F
VJ
Vingerling JR
UA
Uitterlinden AG
MN
Martin NG
HC
Hammond CJ
KM
Kayser M
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Previous studies have successfully identified genetic variants in several genes associated with human iris (eye) color; however, they all used simplified categorical trait information. Here, we quantified continuous eye color variation into hue and saturation values using high-resolution digital full-eye photographs and conducted a genome-wide association study on 5,951 Dutch Europeans from the Rotterdam Study. Three new regions, 1q42.3, 17q25.3, and 21q22.13, were highlighted meeting the criterion for genome-wide statistically significant association. The latter two loci were replicated in 2,261 individuals from the UK and in 1,282 from Australia. The LYST gene at 1q42.3 and the DSCR9 gene at 21q22.13 serve as promising functional candidates. A model for predicting quantitative eye colors explained over 50% of trait variance in the Rotterdam Study. Over all our data exemplify that fine phenotyping is a useful strategy for finding genes involved in human complex traits.

5,951 European ancestry individuals

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

9494
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
Yes
Replicated
3,543 European ancestry individuals
Replication Participants
European
Ancestry
Netherlands, Australia, U.K.
Recruitment Country
Chapter IV

Analysis

Comprehensive review of health and genetic findings

Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.

Analysis In Progress

Our analysis of this publication is currently being prepared. Please check back soon for comprehensive insights into the health and genetic findings discussed in this research.