Menu
GWAS Study

Genome wide study of maternal and parent-of-origin effects on the etiology of orofacial clefts.

Shi M, Murray JC, Marazita ML et al.

22419666 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
2458 Participants
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

SM
Shi M
MJ
Murray JC
MM
Marazita ML
MR
Munger RG
RI
Ruczinski I
HJ
Hetmanski JB
WT
Wu T
MT
Murray T
RR
Redett RJ
WA
Wilcox AJ
LR
Lie RT
JE
Jabs EW
WY
Wu-Chou YH
CP
Chen PK
WH
Wang H
YX
Ye X
YV
Yeow V
CS
Chong SS
SB
Shi B
CK
Christensen K
SA
Scott AF
PP
Patel P
CF
Cheah F
BT
Beaty TH
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

We performed a genome wide association analysis of maternally-mediated genetic effects and parent-of-origin (POO) effects on risk of orofacial clefting (OC) using over 2,000 case-parent triads collected through an international cleft consortium. We used log-linear regression models to test individual SNPs. For SNPs with a P-value <10(-5) for maternal genotypic effects, we also applied a haplotype-based method, TRIMM, to extract potential information from clusters of correlated SNPs. None of the SNPs were significant at the genome wide level. Our results suggest neither maternal genome nor POO effects play major roles in the etiology of OC in our sample. This finding is consistent with previous genetic studies and recent population-based cohort studies in Norway and Denmark, which showed no apparent difference between mother-to-offspring and father-to-offspring recurrence of clefting. We, however, cannot completely rule out maternal genome or POO effects as risk factors because very small effects might not be detectable with our sample size, they may influence risk through interactions with environmental exposures or may act through a more complex network of interacting genes. Thus, the most promising SNPs identified by this study may still be worth further investigation.

1,094 European ancestry triads, 1,277 Asian ancestry triads, 87 triads

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

2458
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
No
Replicated
European, Asian unspecified, Other, European
Ancestry
U.S., Republic of Korea, Singapore, China, Philippines, Norway, Denmark
Recruitment Country
Chapter IV

Analysis

Comprehensive review of health and genetic findings

Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.

Analysis In Progress

Our analysis of this publication is currently being prepared. Please check back soon for comprehensive insights into the health and genetic findings discussed in this research.