Menu
GWAS Study

Genome-wide association study for ovarian cancer susceptibility using pooled DNA.

Lu Y, Chen X, Beesley J et al.

22794196 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
12602 Participants
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

LY
Lu Y
CX
Chen X
BJ
Beesley J
JS
Johnatty SE
DA
deFazio A
LS
Lambrechts S
LD
Lambrechts D
DE
Despierre E
VI
Vergotes I
CJ
Chang-Claude J
HR
Hein R
NS
Nickels S
WS
Wang-Gohrke S
DT
Dörk T
DM
Dürst M
AN
Antonenkova N
BN
Bogdanova N
GM
Goodman MT
LG
Lurie G
WL
Wilkens LR
CM
Carney ME
BR
Butzow R
NH
Nevanlinna H
HT
Heikkinen T
LA
Leminen A
KL
Kiemeney LA
ML
Massuger LFAG
VA
van Altena AM
AK
Aben KK
KS
Kjaer SK
HE
Høgdall E
JA
Jensen A
BA
Brooks-Wilson A
LN
Le N
CL
Cook L
EM
Earp M
KL
Kelemen L
ED
Easton D
PP
Pharoah P
SH
Song H
TJ
Tyrer J
RS
Ramus S
MU
Menon U
GA
Gentry-Maharaj A
GS
Gayther SA
BE
Bandera EV
OS
Olson SH
OI
Orlow I
RL
Rodriguez-Rodriguez L
MS
Macgregor S
CG
Chenevix-Trench G
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Recent Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) have identified four low-penetrance ovarian cancer susceptibility loci. We hypothesized that further moderate- or low-penetrance variants exist among the subset of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) not well tagged by the genotyping arrays used in the previous studies, which would account for some of the remaining risk. We therefore conducted a time- and cost-effective stage 1 GWAS on 342 invasive serous cases and 643 controls genotyped on pooled DNA using the high-density Illumina 1M-Duo array. We followed up 20 of the most significantly associated SNPs, which are not well tagged by the lower density arrays used by the published GWAS, and genotyping them on individual DNA. Most of the top 20 SNPs were clearly validated by individually genotyping the samples used in the pools. However, none of the 20 SNPs replicated when tested for association in a much larger stage 2 set of 4,651 cases and 6,966 controls from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. Given that most of the top 20 SNPs from pooling were validated in the same samples by individual genotyping, the lack of replication is likely to be due to the relatively small sample size in our stage 1 GWAS rather than due to problems with the pooling approach. We conclude that there are unlikely to be any moderate or large effects on ovarian cancer risk untagged by less dense arrays. However, our study lacked power to make clear statements on the existence of hitherto untagged small-effect variants.

342 European ancestry cases, 643 European ancestry controls

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

12602
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
Yes
Replicated
4,651 European ancestry cases, 6,966 European ancestry controls
Replication Participants
European
Ancestry
Australia
Recruitment Country
Chapter IV

Analysis

Comprehensive review of health and genetic findings

Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.

Analysis In Progress

Our analysis of this publication is currently being prepared. Please check back soon for comprehensive insights into the health and genetic findings discussed in this research.