Menu
GWAS Study

Sex-stratified genome-wide association studies including 270,000 individuals show sexual dimorphism in genetic loci for anthropometric traits.

Randall JC, Winkler TW, Kutalik Z et al.

23754948 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
270775 Participants
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

RJ
Randall JC
WT
Winkler TW
KZ
Kutalik Z
BS
Berndt SI
JA
Jackson AU
MK
Monda KL
KT
Kilpeläinen TO
ET
Esko T
MR
Mägi R
LS
Li S
WT
Workalemahu T
FM
Feitosa MF
CD
Croteau-Chonka DC
DF
Day FR
FT
Fall T
FT
Ferreira T
GS
Gustafsson S
LA
Locke AE
MI
Mathieson I
SA
Scherag A
VS
Vedantam S
WA
Wood AR
LL
Liang L
SV
Steinthorsdottir V
TG
Thorleifsson G
DE
Dermitzakis ET
DA
Dimas AS
KF
Karpe F
MJ
Min JL
NG
Nicholson G
CD
Clegg DJ
PT
Person T
KJ
Krohn JP
BS
Bauer S
BC
Buechler C
EK
Eisinger K
BA
Bonnefond A
FP
Froguel P
HJ
Hottenga JJ
PI
Prokopenko I
WL
Waite LL
HT
Harris TB
SA
Smith AV
SA
Shuldiner AR
MW
McArdle WL
CM
Caulfield MJ
MP
Munroe PB
GH
Grönberg H
CY
Chen YD
LG
Li G
BJ
Beckmann JS
JT
Johnson T
TU
Thorsteinsdottir U
TM
Teder-Laving M
KK
Khaw KT
WN
Wareham NJ
ZJ
Zhao JH
AN
Amin N
OB
Oostra BA
KA
Kraja AT
PM
Province MA
CL
Cupples LA
HN
Heard-Costa NL
KJ
Kaprio J
RS
Ripatti S
SI
Surakka I
CF
Collins FS
SJ
Saramies J
TJ
Tuomilehto J
JA
Jula A
SV
Salomaa V
EJ
Erdmann J
HC
Hengstenberg C
LC
Loley C
SH
Schunkert H
LC
Lamina C
WH
Wichmann HE
AE
Albrecht E
GC
Gieger C
HA
Hicks AA
JA
Johansson A
PP
Pramstaller PP
KS
Kathiresan S
SE
Speliotes EK
PB
Penninx B
HA
Hartikainen AL
JM
Jarvelin MR
GU
Gyllensten U
BD
Boomsma DI
CH
Campbell H
WJ
Wilson JF
CS
Chanock SJ
FM
Farrall M
GA
Goel A
MC
Medina-Gomez C
RF
Rivadeneira F
EK
Estrada K
UA
Uitterlinden AG
HA
Hofman A
ZM
Zillikens MC
DH
den Heijer M
KL
Kiemeney LA
MA
Maschio A
HP
Hall P
TJ
Tyrer J
TA
Teumer A
VH
Völzke H
KP
Kovacs P
TA
Tönjes A
MM
Mangino M
ST
Spector TD
HC
Hayward C
RI
Rudan I
HA
Hall AS
SN
Samani NJ
AA
Attwood AP
SJ
Sambrook JG
HJ
Hung J
PL
Palmer LJ
LM
Lokki ML
SJ
Sinisalo J
BG
Boucher G
HH
Huikuri H
LM
Lorentzon M
OC
Ohlsson C
EN
Eklund N
EJ
Eriksson JG
BC
Barlassina C
RC
Rivolta C
NI
Nolte IM
SH
Snieder H
VD
Van der Klauw MM
VV
Van Vliet-Ostaptchouk JV
GP
Gejman PV
SJ
Shi J
JK
Jacobs KB
WZ
Wang Z
BS
Bakker SJ
ML
Mateo Leach I
NG
Navis G
VD
van der Harst P
MN
Martin NG
MS
Medland SE
MG
Montgomery GW
YJ
Yang J
CD
Chasman DI
RP
Ridker PM
RL
Rose LM
LT
Lehtimäki T
RO
Raitakari O
AD
Absher D
IC
Iribarren C
BH
Basart H
HK
Hovingh KG
HE
Hyppönen E
PC
Power C
AD
Anderson D
BJ
Beilby JP
HJ
Hui J
JJ
Jolley J
SH
Sager H
BS
Bornstein SR
SP
Schwarz PE
KK
Kristiansson K
PM
Perola M
LJ
Lindström J
SA
Swift AJ
UM
Uusitupa M
AM
Atalay M
LT
Lakka TA
RR
Rauramaa R
BJ
Bolton JL
FG
Fowkes G
FR
Fraser RM
PJ
Price JF
FK
Fischer K
KK
Krjutå Kov K
MA
Metspalu A
ME
Mihailov E
LC
Langenberg C
LJ
Luan J
OK
Ong KK
CP
Chines PS
KS
Keinanen-Kiukaanniemi SM
ST
Saaristo TE
ES
Edkins S
FP
Franks PW
HG
Hallmans G
SD
Shungin D
MA
Morris AD
PC
Palmer CN
ER
Erbel R
MS
Moebus S
NM
Nöthen MM
PS
Pechlivanis S
HK
Hveem K
NN
Narisu N
HA
Hamsten A
HS
Humphries SE
SR
Strawbridge RJ
TE
Tremoli E
GH
Grallert H
TB
Thorand B
IT
Illig T
KW
Koenig W
MM
Müller-Nurasyid M
PA
Peters A
BB
Boehm BO
KM
Kleber ME
MW
März W
WB
Winkelmann BR
KJ
Kuusisto J
LM
Laakso M
AD
Arveiler D
CG
Cesana G
KK
Kuulasmaa K
VJ
Virtamo J
YJ
Yarnell JW
KD
Kuh D
WA
Wong A
LL
Lind L
DF
de Faire U
GB
Gigante B
MP
Magnusson PK
PN
Pedersen NL
DG
Dedoussis G
DM
Dimitriou M
KG
Kolovou G
KS
Kanoni S
SK
Stirrups K
BL
Bonnycastle LL
NI
Njølstad I
WT
Wilsgaard T
GA
Ganna A
RE
Rehnberg E
HA
Hingorani A
KM
Kivimaki M
KM
Kumari M
AT
Assimes TL
BI
Barroso I
BM
Boehnke M
BI
Borecki IB
DP
Deloukas P
FC
Fox CS
FT
Frayling T
GL
Groop LC
HT
Haritunians T
HD
Hunter D
IE
Ingelsson E
KR
Kaplan R
MK
Mohlke KL
OJ
O'Connell JR
SD
Schlessinger D
SD
Strachan DP
SK
Stefansson K
VD
van Duijn CM
AG
Abecasis GR
MM
McCarthy MI
HJ
Hirschhorn JN
QL
Qi L
LR
Loos RJ
LC
Lindgren CM
NK
North KE
HI
Heid IM
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Given the anthropometric differences between men and women and previous evidence of sex-difference in genetic effects, we conducted a genome-wide search for sexually dimorphic associations with height, weight, body mass index, waist circumference, hip circumference, and waist-to-hip-ratio (133,723 individuals) and took forward 348 SNPs into follow-up (additional 137,052 individuals) in a total of 94 studies. Seven loci displayed significant sex-difference (FDR<5%), including four previously established (near GRB14/COBLL1, LYPLAL1/SLC30A10, VEGFA, ADAMTS9) and three novel anthropometric trait loci (near MAP3K1, HSD17B4, PPARG), all of which were genome-wide significant in women (P<5×10(-8)), but not in men. Sex-differences were apparent only for waist phenotypes, not for height, weight, BMI, or hip circumference. Moreover, we found no evidence for genetic effects with opposite directions in men versus women. The PPARG locus is of specific interest due to its role in diabetes genetics and therapy. Our results demonstrate the value of sex-specific GWAS to unravel the sexually dimorphic genetic underpinning of complex traits.

up to 60,586 European ancestry males, up to 73,137 European ancestry females

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

270775
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
Yes
Replicated
up to 62,395 European ancestry males, up to 74,657 European ancestry females
Replication Participants
European
Ancestry
U.S.
Recruitment Country
Chapter IV

Analysis

Comprehensive review of health and genetic findings

Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.

Analysis In Progress

Our analysis of this publication is currently being prepared. Please check back soon for comprehensive insights into the health and genetic findings discussed in this research.