Menu
GWAS Study

Bayesian and frequentist analysis of an Austrian genome-wide association study of colorectal cancer and advanced adenomas.

Hofer P, Hagmann M, Brezina S et al.

29228715 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
2469 Participants
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

HP
Hofer P
HM
Hagmann M
BS
Brezina S
DE
Dolejsi E
MK
Mach K
LG
Leeb G
BA
Baierl A
BS
Buch S
SH
Sutterlüty-Fall H
KJ
Karner-Hanusch J
BM
Bergmann MM
BT
Bachleitner-Hofmann T
SA
Stift A
GA
Gerger A
RK
Rötzer K
KJ
Karner J
SS
Stättner S
WM
Waldenberger M
MT
Meitinger T
SK
Strauch K
LJ
Linseisen J
GC
Gieger C
FF
Frommlet F
GA
Gsur A
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Most genome-wide association studies (GWAS) were analyzed using single marker tests in combination with stringent correction procedures for multiple testing. Thus, a substantial proportion of associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) remained undetected and may account for missing heritability in complex traits. Model selection procedures present a powerful alternative to identify associated SNPs in high-dimensional settings. In this GWAS including 1060 colorectal cancer cases, 689 cases of advanced colorectal adenomas and 4367 controls we pursued a dual approach to investigate genome-wide associations with disease risk applying both, single marker analysis and model selection based on the modified Bayesian information criterion, mBIC2, implemented in the software package MOSGWA. For different case-control comparisons, we report models including between 1-14 candidate SNPs. A genome-wide significant association of rs17659990 (P=5.43×10-9, DOCK3, chromosome 3p21.2) with colorectal cancer risk was observed. Furthermore, 56 SNPs known to influence susceptibility to colorectal cancer and advanced adenoma were tested in a hypothesis-driven approach and several of them were found to be relevant in our Austrian cohort. After correction for multiple testing (α=8.9×10-4), the most significant associations were observed for SNPs rs10505477 (P=6.08×10-4) and rs6983267 (P=7.35×10-4) of CASC8, rs3802842 (P=8.98×10-5, COLCA1,2), and rs12953717 (P=4.64×10-4, SMAD7). All previously unreported SNPs demand replication in additional samples. Reanalysis of existing GWAS datasets using model selection as tool to detect SNPs associated with a complex trait may present a promising resource to identify further genetic risk variants not only for colorectal cancer.

978 Austrian ancestry colorectal cancer cases, 636 Austrian ancestry advanced colorectal adenoma cases, , 855 Austrian ancestry controls

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

2469
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
No
Replicated
European
Ancestry
Austria, Germany
Recruitment Country
Chapter IV

Analysis

Comprehensive review of health and genetic findings

Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.

Analysis In Progress

Our analysis of this publication is currently being prepared. Please check back soon for comprehensive insights into the health and genetic findings discussed in this research.