Menu
GWAS Study

Gene-Based Analysis Reveals Sex-Specific Genetic Risk Factors of COPD.

Joo J, Himes B

35308900 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
108589 Participants
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

JJ
Joo J
HB
Himes B
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Sex-specific differences have been noted among people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but whether these differences are attributable to genetic variation is poorly understood. The availability of large biobanks with deeply phenotyped subjects such as the UK Biobank enables the investigation of sex-specific genetic associations that may provide new insights into COPD risk factors. We performed sex-stratified genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of COPD (male: 12,958 cases and 95,631 controls; female: 11,311 cases and 123,714 controls) and found that while most associations were shared between sexes, several regions had sex-specific contributions, including respiratory viral infection-related loci in/near C5orf56 and PELI1. Using the newly developed R package 'snpsettest', we performed gene-based association tests and identified gene-level sex-specific associations, including C5orf56 on 5q31.1, CFDP1/TMEM170A/CHST6 on 16q23.1 and ASTN2/TRIM32 on 9q33.1. Our results identified promising genes to pursue in functional studies to better understand sexual dimorphism in COPD.

12,958 British ancestry male cases, 95,631 British ancestry male controls

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

108589
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
No
Replicated
European
Ancestry
U.K.
Recruitment Country
Chapter IV

Analysis

Comprehensive review of health and genetic findings

Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.

Analysis In Progress

Our analysis of this publication is currently being prepared. Please check back soon for comprehensive insights into the health and genetic findings discussed in this research.