Menu
GWAS Study

Sex differences in the genetic architecture of cognitive resilience to Alzheimer's disease.

Eissman JM, Dumitrescu L, Mahoney ER et al.

35552371 PubMed ID
GWAS Study Type
4407 Participants
Scroll to explore
Chapter I

Publication Details

Comprehensive information about this research publication

Authors

EJ
Eissman JM
DL
Dumitrescu L
ME
Mahoney ER
SA
Smith AN
MS
Mukherjee S
LM
Lee ML
SP
Scollard P
CS
Choi SE
BW
Bush WS
EC
Engelman CD
LQ
Lu Q
FD
Fardo DW
TE
Trittschuh EH
MJ
Mez J
KC
Kaczorowski CC
HS
Hernandez Saucedo H
WK
Widaman KF
BR
Buckley RF
PM
Properzi MJ
ME
Mormino EC
YH
Yang HS
HT
Harrison TM
HT
Hedden T
NK
Nho K
AS
Andrews SJ
TD
Tommet D
HN
Hadad N
SR
Sanders RE
RD
Ruderfer DM
GK
Gifford KA
ZX
Zhong X
RN
Raghavan NS
VB
Vardarajan BN
PM
Pericak-Vance MA
FL
Farrer LA
WL
Wang LS
CC
Cruchaga C
SG
Schellenberg GD
CN
Cox NJ
HJ
Haines JL
KC
Keene CD
SA
Saykin AJ
LE
Larson EB
SR
Sperling RA
MR
Mayeux R
CM
Cuccaro ML
BD
Bennett DA
SJ
Schneider JA
CP
Crane PK
JA
Jefferson AL
HT
Hohman TJ
Chapter II

Abstract

Summary of the research findings

Approximately 30% of elderly adults are cognitively unimpaired at time of death despite the presence of Alzheimer's disease neuropathology at autopsy. Studying individuals who are resilient to the cognitive consequences of Alzheimer's disease neuropathology may uncover novel therapeutic targets to treat Alzheimer's disease. It is well established that there are sex differences in response to Alzheimer's disease pathology, and growing evidence suggests that genetic factors may contribute to these differences. Taken together, we sought to elucidate sex-specific genetic drivers of resilience. We extended our recent large scale genomic analysis of resilience in which we harmonized cognitive data across four cohorts of cognitive ageing, in vivo amyloid PET across two cohorts, and autopsy measures of amyloid neuritic plaque burden across two cohorts. These data were leveraged to build robust, continuous resilience phenotypes. With these phenotypes, we performed sex-stratified [n (males) = 2093, n (females) = 2931] and sex-interaction [n (both sexes) = 5024] genome-wide association studies (GWAS), gene and pathway-based tests, and genetic correlation analyses to clarify the variants, genes and molecular pathways that relate to resilience in a sex-specific manner. Estimated among cognitively normal individuals of both sexes, resilience was 20-25% heritable, and when estimated in either sex among cognitively normal individuals, resilience was 15-44% heritable. In our GWAS, we identified a female-specific locus on chromosome 10 [rs827389, β (females) = 0.08, P (females) = 5.76 × 10-09, β (males) = -0.01, P(males) = 0.70, β (interaction) = 0.09, P (interaction) = 1.01 × 10-04] in which the minor allele was associated with higher resilience scores among females. This locus is located within chromatin loops that interact with promoters of genes involved in RNA processing, including GATA3. Finally, our genetic correlation analyses revealed shared genetic architecture between resilience phenotypes and other complex traits, including a female-specific association with frontotemporal dementia and male-specific associations with heart rate variability traits. We also observed opposing associations between sexes for multiple sclerosis, such that more resilient females had a lower genetic susceptibility to multiple sclerosis, and more resilient males had a higher genetic susceptibility to multiple sclerosis. Overall, we identified sex differences in the genetic architecture of resilience, identified a female-specific resilience locus and highlighted numerous sex-specific molecular pathways that may underly resilience to Alzheimer's disease pathology. This study illustrates the need to conduct sex-aware genomic analyses to identify novel targets that are unidentified in sex-agnostic models. Our findings support the theory that the most successful treatment for an individual with Alzheimer's disease may be personalized based on their biological sex and genetic context.

up to 1,857 European ancestry men, up to 2,550 European ancestry women

Chapter III

Study Statistics

Key metrics and study information

4407
Total Participants
GWAS
Study Type
No
Replicated
European
Ancestry
Chapter IV

Analysis

Comprehensive review of health and genetic findings

Important Disclaimer: This review has been performed semi-automatically and is provided for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, this analysis may contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the original research. DNA Genics disclaims all liability for any inaccuracies, errors, or consequences arising from the use of this information. Users should independently verify all information and consult original research publications before making any decisions based on this content. This analysis is not intended as a substitute for professional scientific review or medical advice.

Analysis In Progress

Our analysis of this publication is currently being prepared. Please check back soon for comprehensive insights into the health and genetic findings discussed in this research.